Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://paper.sci.ui.ac.id/jspui/handle/2808.28/415
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Dimyati, Muhammad | - |
dc.contributor.author | Dimyati, Ratih Dewanti | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kustiyo, Kustiyo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Danoedoro, Projo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hartono, Hartono | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-28T03:23:49Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-28T03:23:49Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018-06 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1693-6930 | - |
dc.identifier.other | DOI: 10.12928/TELKOMNIKA.v16i3.9331 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://paper.sci.ui.ac.id/jspui/handle/2808.28/415 | - |
dc.description.abstract | To verify whether the annual mosaic image of MTB model is acceptable for further digital analysis, it is necessary to evaluate the visual interpretability. The MTB model is an effort to integrate multi-scene and multi-temporal data, to obtain a minimum cloud cover mosaic image in locations that are often covered by clouds and haze. This study is to evaluate the interpretability of the annual mosaic image for analysis of the land cover changes. The data used are the images of 2015, 2016, and 2017 covers a part of central Sumatra. Visual interpretations with a series of steps are used, starting with identification of the objects using interpretation keys, followed by spectral band correlations, scattergram analysis, and ended by consistency assessment. The consistency assessment step is performed to determine the level of clearness and easiness of the object recognition in the annual mosaic images. The results showed that the most optimal spectral bands used for RGB combinations for visual interpretation were Band SWIR -1, Band NIR, and Band Red. Based on the evaluation results, the annual mosaic image o f MTB model performed the consistent results of the clearness objects and the easiness of the object recognition. Thus the annual mosaic image of MTB model of 0.02x0.02 degree tile is acceptable for further digital processing as well as digital land cover analysis. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science (IAES) | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Volume 16;No. 3 | - |
dc.source | TELKOMNIKA, Vol.16, No.3, June 2018, pp. 934~945 | en_US |
dc.source.uri | http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/TELKOMNIKA/article/view/9331/pdf_676 | en_US |
dc.subject | interpretability evaluation | en_US |
dc.subject | annual mosaic image | en_US |
dc.subject | visual interpretations | en_US |
dc.subject | scattergram analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | consistency of the results | en_US |
dc.subject | the level of clearness | en_US |
dc.subject | the level of easiness | en_US |
dc.subject | standardization of data processing | en_US |
dc.title | Interpretability Evaluation of Annual Mosaic Image of MTB Model for Land Cover Changes Analysis | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Collection |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
5. Interpretability Evaluation of Annual Mosaic Image of MTB Model for Land Cover Changes Analysis.pdf | 2,22 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.